Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials
Awedew AF, Seman YS, Yalew DZ, Wondmeneh YC, Yigzaw WA.
Urolithiasis. 2023 May 15;51(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01454-2. PMID: 37184592
The effect of piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy with 2- and 8-mm focus sizes on stone disintegration and renal injury
Noureldin YA, Abdel Halim WA, Elnahif E, El Shaer A, Shaher H, Fattah AAEA, Hashem A, El-Dakhakhny AS, Zahran AA, El Hamshary SA.
BJU Int. 2023 May 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.16083. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37216189
Ureteral Wall Thickness Is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Dean NS, Millan B, Uy M, Albers P, Campbell SM, Krambeck AE, De SJ.
Urol. 2023 May 26:101097JU0000000000003561. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003561. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37232694 Review
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the use of hydroxycitric acid adjuvant to shock wave lithotripsy therapy in patients with calcium stones. Stone fragmentation results
Del Carmen Cano García M, Cobos RC, Bohorquez ÁV, Díaz PM, Castillo YY, Ruiz CR, Gutiérrez-Tejero F, Polo MÁA, Martín MA.
Urolithiasis. 2023 May 30;51(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01456-0. PMID: 37249658 Clinical Trial
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones
Gong Z, Li Y, Zhang H, Pan C, Li J, Liu G, Bai S.
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 5;51(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01460-4. PMID: 37272997
Anti-GBM disease associated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
López-González Gila JD, Aguilar Jaldo MP, Plata Sánchez RM, Mañero Rodríguez CA.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03657-3. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37280315
High-frequency shock wave lithotripsy: stone comminution and evaluation of renal parenchyma injury in a porcine ex-vivo model
Rassweiler-Seyfried MC, Mayer J, Goldenstedt C, Storz R, Marlinghaus E, Heine G, Alken P, Rassweiler JJ.
World J Urol. 2023 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04441-9. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37284842
Cystine Stones: Developments in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Impact on Morbidity and Stone Clearance
Hughes T, Tzelves L, Somani BK.
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 5;15:175-185. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S381190. eCollection 2023.PMID: 37303487 Review
[Effect of adjunctive drug therapy on early expulsion of distal ureteral calculi after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy]
Ji MH, Zhang X, Han X, Wang X, Cui L.Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi.
2023 Mar 28;103(12):924-926. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221201-02545.PMID: 36973221
Can shock wave lithotripsy lead to impaction of ureteral stones?. The perspective of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) urolithiasis and endourology workin party
Tsaturyan A, Esperto F, Tailly T, Talso M, Sener ET, DE Coninck V, Pietropaolo A.
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Apr;75(2):251-253. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05318-1.PMID: 36999842
The use of intelligent analysis (IA) in determining the tactics of treating patients with nephrolithiasis
Alexander Izrailevich N, Boris Alexandrovich N, Artem Vladimirovich E, Leonid Grigoryevich S, Dmitry Olegovich K, Dmitry Georgievich T, Leonid Moiseevich R.
Urologia. 2023 Apr 3:3915603231162881. doi: 10.1177/03915603231162881. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37006180
Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Low intermediate or high: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiao K, Zhou L, Zhu S, Lin L, Di X, Li H.
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 15;10:1063159. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1063159. eCollection 2023. PMID: 37009606 Review.
Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis
Peng CX, Lou YK, Xu L, Wu GH, Zhou XL, Wang KE, Ye CH.
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01226-5. PMID: 37016405
Endoscopic management of encrusted ureteral stents: outcomes and tips and tricks
Tsaturyan A, Faria-Costa G, Peteinaris A, Lattarulo M, Martinez BB, Vrettos T, Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P.
World J Urol. 2023 May;41(5):1415-1421. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04361-8. Epub 2023 Apr 6. PMID: 37024556
Management of Pancreatic Calculi in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review Article
Kaushik N, Dasari V, Jain D.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 5;15(3):e35788. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35788. eCollection 2023 Mar. PMID: 37025704 Review
Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models
Popiolek M, Jendeberg J, Sundqvist P, Wagenius M, Lidén M.
Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 7;51(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01444-4. PMID: 37027057
Numerical investigation of shock-induced bubble collapse dynamics and fluid-solid interactions during shock-wave lithotripsy
Koukas E, Papoutsakis A, Gavaises M.
Ultrason Sonochem. 2023 Mar 31;95:106393. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106393. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37031534
Kidney stone disease
Osther SS, Andersen K, Andersen M, Andreassen KH, Bube S, Bigum LH, Jahn H, Jung H, Fuglsig S, Hansen MB, Kloster B, Kobberø H, Lildal SK, Liltorp DL, Menne S, Nøhr M, Spjeldnæs N, Topcü SO, Osther PJS.
Ugeskr Laeger. 2023 Apr 3;185(14):V11220687. PMID: 37057692
Prevalence of Stone Disease and Procedure Trends in the United States
Monga M, Murphy M, Paranjpe R, Cutone B, Eisner B.
Urology. 2023 Apr 14:S0090-4295(23)00313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.040. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37062518
Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal
Tzelves L, Geraghty RM, Hughes T, Juliebø-Jones P, Somani BK.
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Apr 11;15:131-139. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S386844. eCollection 2023. PMID: 37069942
Outcomes of Paediatric Cystine Stone Management: Results of a Systematic Review
Ripa F, Pietropaolo A, Geraghty R, Griffin S, Cook P, Somani B.
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr 20. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01162-9. Online ahead of print.PMID: 37079195 Review
Erector spinae plane block prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy decreases fluoroscopy time and promise a comfortable procedure for renal stones: A prospective randomized study
Karaaslan M, Olcucuoglu E, Kurtbeyoglu S, Tonyali S, Yilmaz M, Odabas O.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Apr 20:S2173-5786(23)00041-0. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.001. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37084807
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic pancreatic stenting without pancreatic sphincterotomy for the treatment of pancreatolithiasis: a case series
Endo S, Kawaguchi S, Satoh T, Shirane N.
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s12328-023-01803-z. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37087534
Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones - Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?
Luk A, Geraghty R, Somani B.
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37097431 Review
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Multimodal Treatment of Pancreatic Duct Leakage in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
Roug S, Novovic S, Hansen EF, Hadi A, Schmidt PN, Jørgensen HL, Karstensen JG.
Pancreas. 2022 Nov-Dec 01;51(10):1315-1319. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002196. PMID: 37099772
Surgical Stone Treatment: Patterns May Predict Performance on Episode-based Cost Measure in the Quality Payment Program
Dowling RA, Chen Q, Goldfischer E, Albala DM.
Urol Pract. 2023 May 5:101097UPJ0000000000000407. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000407. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37103884
Is low-dose tadalafil better than tamsulosin? A randomized controlled trial in shockwave lithotripsy for solitary upper tract calculi
Sadanala ME, Dangi AD, Rajendran G, Balavendra A, Annadurai S, Mukha RP, Singh JC, Devasia A, Kumar S.
BJU Int. 2023 May 2. doi: 10.1111/bju.16038. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37129977
Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials
Awedew AF, Seman YS, Yalew DZ, Wondmeneh YC, Yigzaw WA.
Urolithiasis. 2023 May 15;51(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01454-2. PMID: 37184592
The effect of piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy with 2- and 8-mm focus sizes on stone disintegration and renal injury
Noureldin YA, Abdel Halim WA, Elnahif E, El Shaer A, Shaher H, Fattah AAEA, Hashem A, El-Dakhakhny AS, Zahran AA, El Hamshary SA.
BJU Int. 2023 May 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.16083. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37216189
Ureteral Wall Thickness Is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Dean NS, Millan B, Uy M, Albers P, Campbell SM, Krambeck AE, De S.J
Urol. 2023 May 26:101097JU0000000000003561. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003561. Online ahead of print.PMID: 37232694 Review.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the use of hydroxycitric acid adjuvant to shock wave lithotripsy therapy in patients with calcium stones. Stone fragmentation results
Del Carmen Cano García M, Cobos RC, Bohorquez ÁV, Díaz PM, Castillo YY, Ruiz CR, Gutiérrez-Tejero F, Polo MÁA, Martín MA.
Urolithiasis. 2023 May 30;51(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01456-0.PMID: 37249658
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones
Gong Z, Li Y, Zhang H, Pan C, Li J, Liu G, Bai S.
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jun 5;51(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01460-4.PMID: 37272997
Anti-GBM disease associated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
López-González Gila JD, Aguilar Jaldo MP, Plata Sánchez RM, Mañero Rodríguez CA.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03657-3. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37280315.
High-frequency shock wave lithotripsy: stone comminution and evaluation of renal parenchyma injury in a porcine ex-vivo model
Rassweiler-Seyfried MC, Mayer J, Goldenstedt C, Storz R, Marlinghaus E, Heine G, Alken P, Rassweiler JJ.
World J Urol. 2023 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04441-9. Online ahead of print. PMID: 37284842
Cystine Stones: Developments in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Impact on Morbidity and Stone Clearance
Hughes T, Tzelves L, Somani BK.
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 5;15:175-185. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S381190. eCollection 2023.PMID: 37303487 Review
The New Lithotripsy Index predicts success of shock wave lithotripsy
Keskin SK, Spencer M, Lovegrove C, Turney BW.
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3049-3053. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04215-9. Epub 2022 Nov 15. PMID: 36380209
[Evaluation of the results and feasibility of vibration, diuresis and inversion therapy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones]
Delonca R, Anastay V, Gondran-Tellier B, Baboudjian M, Di Crocco E, Maffei P, Thirakul S, Bienvenu L, Delaporte V, Akiki A, Gaillet S, Karsenty G, Lechevallier E, Boissier R.
Prog Urol. 2022 Dec 27:S1166-7087(22)00513-9. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.12.005. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36581504
Time Course and Risk Factors for Repeat Procedures After Ureteroscopy or Shockwave Lithotripsy
Wong DG, Monda S, Vetter J, Lai HH, Olsen MA, Keller M, Desai A.
Urology. 2022 Dec 24:S0090-4295(22)01081-0. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.014. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36574909
Editorial Comment: Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤ 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Danilovic A.
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Nov-Dec;48(6):992-993. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.06.04. PMID: 36173412. Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Upper and Lower Ureteral Stones in Non-obese and Non-Pre-stented Adults: Is One Session Sufficient?
Alsmadi JK.
Cureus. 2022 Sep 26;14(9):e29592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29592. eCollection 2022 Sep. PMID: 36176477
Development of a Surgical Decision Aid for Patients with Nephrolithiasis: Shockwave Lithotripsy vs Ureteroscopy
Dibianco JM, Conrado B, Daignault S, Hawley S, Lane G, Wenzler D, Seifman B, Phelps J, Cotant M, Ghani KR, Dauw CA.
J Endourol. 2022 Oct 3. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0494. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36193563
The Efficiency of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones: An Unjustly Forgotten Option?
Alić J, Heljić J, Hadžiosmanović O, Kulovac B, Lepara Z, Spahović H, Bajramović S, Aganović D.
Cureus. 2022 Sep 1;14(9):e28671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28671. eCollection 2022 Sep. PMID: 36196280
Non-contrast computed tomography-based factors in predicting ESWL success: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Güler Y.
Prog Urol. 2022 Oct 3:S1166-7087(22)00420-1. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.09.015. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36202729
First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones
Hall MK, Thiel J, Dunmire B, Samson PC, Kessler R, Sunaryo P, Sweet RM, Metzler IS, Chang HC, Gunn M, Dighe M, Anderson L, Popchoi C, Managuli R, Cunitz BW, Burke BH, Ding L, Gutierrez B, Liu Z, Sorensen MD, Wessells H, Bailey MR, Harper JD.
J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1075-1082. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002864. Epub 2022 Nov 1. PMID: 36205340
Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy Trends from 2012 to 2019 Within the US Medicare Dataset: Sharp Growth in Ureteroscopy Utilization
Haas CR, Li S, Knoedler MA, Penniston KL, Nakada SY.
J Endourol. 2022 Nov 3. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0402. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36205599
Value of Music and Nitrous Oxide for Pain Control during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL)
Bueno-Serrano G, Alcoba-García MP, Tabares-Jiménez J, González-López R, Llanos-Jiménez L, Mahillo-Fernández I, González-Enguita C.
Arch Esp Urol. 2022 Sep;75(7):624-629. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227507.90. PMID: 36214144. Clinical Trial.
Konnopka C, Becker B, Netsch C, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ, Lusuardi L, Knoll T, König HH.
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3021-3027. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04180-3. Epub 2022 Oct 14. PMID: 36239809
Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yao F, Li K, Huang S, Cheng X, Jiang X.
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Oct 15;14:17562872221128473. doi: 10.1177/17562872221128473. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. PMID: 36267107
Per-oral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy vs. extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treating refractory main pancreatic duct stones in chronic pancreatitis: Protocol for an open-label multi-center randomized clinical trial
Han S, Miley A, Akshintala V, Freeman ML, Kahaleh M, Othman M, Patel S, Papachristou GI, Raijman I, Sankey N, Sayana H, Singh V, Tarnasky P, Trikudanathan G, Shah RJ.
Pancreatology. 2022 Dec;22(8):1120-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.09.245. Epub 2022 Oct 15. PMID: 36273991
Hepatic Abscess After Pancreatic Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Ramsey ML, Bender M, Lara LF, Han S.
ACG Case Rep J. 2022 Oct 18;9(10):e00896. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000896. eCollection 2022 Oct. PMID: 36277738
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Patients with Urinary Calculi
Zhang D, Liang Z, Wang D, Lv J, Ding D, Yu D.
Markers. 2022 Oct 13;2022:3468692. doi: 10.1155/2022/3468692. eCollection 2022. PMID: 36277985 Clinical Trial.
Experimental Observation of Isolative Efficacy of a Solid Coupling Medium in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy-Implications to Nosocomial Infection Prevention
Chou HW, Huang CL, Lin YC, Lin YE, Chen WC.
Pathogens. 2022 Sep 27;11(10):1103. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101103. PMID: 36297160
GeoBioMed perspectives on kidney stone recurrence from the reactive surface area of SWL-derived particles
Todorov LG, Sivaguru M, Krambeck AE, Lee MS, Lieske JC, Fouke BW.
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-233315. PMID: 36319741
Endourology treatment of giant ureteral stone: Distal ureteral stone lithotripsy with nephroscope and shockpulse
Ferry K, Ferdian V.
Urol Case Rep. 2022 Oct 19;45:102265. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102265. eCollection 2022 Nov. PMID: 36324317
The New Lithotripsy Index predicts success of shock wave lithotripsy
Keskin SK, Spencer M, Lovegrove C, Turney BW.
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3049-3053. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04215-9. Epub 2022 Nov 15. PMID: 36380209
Trends and patterns of initial percutaneous nephrolithotomy and subsequent procedures among commercially-insured US adults with urinary system stone disease: a 10-year population-based study
Johnston SS, Johnson BH, Rai P, Grange P, Amos T, Ghosh S, Buchholz N.
World J Urol. 2022 Nov 19. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04210-0. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36401135
International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave Lithotripsy
Zeng G, Zhong W, Chaussy CG, Tiselius HG, Xu C, Turney B, Turk C, Tailly GG, Preminger GM, Akpinar H, Petrik A, Bernardo N, Wiseman O, Farahat Y, Budia A, Jones DK, Beltran Suarez E, De Marco F, Mazzon G, Lv J, Natchagande G, Guven S, Ibrahim TAA, Xu H, Xie L, Ye Z, Sarica K.
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov 23:S2405-4569(22)00263-2. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.013. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36435718
Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs. flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of urinary calculi: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lv G, Qi W, Gao H, Zhou Y, Zhong M, Wang K, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Zhou C, Li Y, Zhang L, Zhang D.
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 7;9:925481. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.925481. eCollection 2022. PMID: 36420414. Review.
Enabling national improvement in quality of care for renal colic
Finch W, Calvert RC, Fowler S, Hermans L, Dickinson A, Smith D.
BJU Int. 2022 Nov 28. doi: 10.1111/bju.15936. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36440494
Are Newer Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Models Truly Improving Pancreatolithiasis Lithotripsy Performance? A Japanese Single-Center Study Using Endoscopic Adjunctive Treatment
Ito K, Okano N, Takuma K, Iwasaki S, Watanabe K, Kimura Y, Yamada Y, Yoshimoto K, Hara S, Kishimoto Y, Matsuda T, Igarashi Y.
Gut Liver. 2022 Dec 13. doi: 10.5009/gnl220204. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36510774
Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A study on feasibility and efficacy in stone clearance and reducing morbidity in ureteric and renal stones with colic
Tiwari AK, Sarkar D, Pal DK.
Urologia. 2022 Dec 14:3915603221140444. doi: 10.1177/03915603221140444. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36515575
Can We Identify Patients in Danger of Delayed Treatment? Management of COVID-19 Pandemic Backlog in Urology Care in Poland
Ratajczak JM, Gawrońska A, Fischer M, Hladun T, Marczak M.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16547. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416547. PMID: 36554427
Can we predict the ancillary treatments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and upper ureteral stones?
Ibrahim A, Elatreisy A, Khogeer A, Ahmadi A, Mishra S, Faisal M, Sabnis R, Aube-Peterkin M, Carrier S, Ganpule A, Desai M.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Dec 27;94(4):439-442. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.4.439. PMID: 36576455
A Comparative Study of Stone Re-Treatment after Lithotripsy
Chiou YE, Chung CH, Chien WC, Tsay PK, Kan HC, Weng WH.
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;12(12):2130. doi: 10.3390/life12122130. PMID: 36556495
Is Triple D Score Effective to Predict the Stone-Free Rate After Shockwave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Population?
Bulut M, Dincer E, Coşkun A, Can U, Telli O.
J Endourol. 2022 Sep 12. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0349. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36094110
Reduction of pre-procedural anxiety for repeat sessions in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) reduces pain intensity: A prospective observational study
Tamalvanan V, Rajandram R, Kuppusamy S.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 16;101(37):e30425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030425. PMID: 36123909
Management of encrusted ureteral stents: Two center experience
Thangavelu M, Abdallah MY, Isola OJ, Kotb A.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Sep 26;94(3):305-310. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.3.305. PMID: 36165475
Effect of Precision Health Education on Compliance Behavior after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Li CC, Zhang ZW.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 14;2022:3306036. doi: 10.1155/2022/3306036. eCollection 2022. PMID: 36158133
Massive perinephric hematoma - A rare complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Para SA, Wani MS, Ahmad MS, Hamid A, Lone SS, Singh S.
Urol Case Rep. 2022 Sep 12;45:102224. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102224. eCollection 2022 Nov. PMID: 36160067
Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications
Demirelli E, Öğreden E, Tok DS, Demiray Ö, Karadayi M, Oğuz U.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022 Aug;68(8):1068-1072. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220237. PMID: 36134836
Modified shockwave propulsion lithotripsy improves the lower pole renal stone clearance
Grabsky A, Arzumanyan K, Shadyan G, Aloyan A, Ayvazyan L, Ballesta Martinez B, Tsaturyan A.
Urolithiasis. 2022 Sep 26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01361-y. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36156104
Outcomes of alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy following shockwave lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Brain E, Geraghty RM, Tzelves L, Mourmouris P, Chatzikrachtis N, Karavitakis M, Skolarikos A, Somani BK.
BJU Int. 2022 Sep 26. doi: 10.1111/bju.15901. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36156845 Review.
Acute extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones - 7-years' experience from a busy district general hospital
Young MJ, Pang KH, Elmussarah M, Hughes PF, Browning AJ, Symons SJ.
BJU Int. 2022 Jun 10. doi: 10.1111/bju.15820. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35689415
The usefulness of the Hounsfield unit and stone heterogeneity variation in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome
Oktay C, Çoraplı M, Tutuş A.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 May;28(3):187-192. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20945. PMID: 35748199
Cystinuria: An Overview of Challenges and Surgical Management
Clark CS, Gnanappiragasam S, Thomas K, Bultitude M.
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 16;9:812226. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.812226. eCollection 2022. PMID: 35784929 Review. No abstract available.
Effect of targeting and generator type on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Motolova M, Kral M.
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022 Jun 27. doi: 10.5507/bp.2022.029. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35801399
Contributions to expenditure in endoscopic stone management: a costly process
Mondschein R, Bolton D, Tan S, Vu MH, McCahy P.
Urolithiasis. 2022 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01344-z. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35802151
Are the current nomograms sufficient to predict shockwave lithotripsy outcomes?
Culpan M, Acar HC, Akalin K, Cakici MC, Tufekci B, Gunduz N, Dogan MB, Yildirim A, Atis G.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jul 5:S2173-5786(22)00053-1. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.012. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35803872 English, Spanish.
Variation and Correlation in Postoperative Imaging After Shockwave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy by Treatment Modality: Results of a Statewide Clinical Registry
DiBianco JM, Daignault-Newton S, Conrado B, Jafri SM, Korman H, Johnson J, Ghani KR, Dauw CA.
Urology. 2022 Jul 6:S0090-4295(22)00543-X. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.029. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35809701
The Effect of Inhalation Aromatherapy and Music Therapy on Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Rohi Ganji M, Jafari F, Rezaeian S, Abdi H, Farzaei MH, Khatony A.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 29;2022:8015798. doi: 10.1155/2022/8015798. eCollection 2022. PMID: 35815287
Opioid usage differs significantly following ureteroscopy and shockwave lithotripsy, while development of long-term usage is positively correlated with total days' supply and total MME supplied
James ST, Pandit AA, Machado B, Payakachat N, Kamel M.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03313-2. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35907159
Functional and Morphological Changes Associated with Burst Wave Lithotripsy-Treated Pig Kidneys
Connors BA, Gardner T, Liu Z, Lingeman JE, Kreider W, Williams JC.
Endourol. 2022 Sep 5. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0295. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35920117
Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022
Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Lombardo R, Yuan C, Thomas K, Petrik A, Neisius A, Türk C, Gambaro G, Skolarikos A, Somani BK.
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Aug 1:S2405-4569(22)00144-4. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35927160
Re: Fragmentation of Stones by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in the First 19 Humans
Yang H, Stoller M.
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug 3:S0302-2838(22)02524-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.012. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35933243 No abstract available.
Preliminary trial of 24 vs 72 hour perioperative meropenem in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteriuria scheduled for urological procedures.
Radko M, Guzek A, Syryło T, Rybicki Z, Zieliński H.
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(2):209-215. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0109. Epub 2022 Jun 22. PMID: 35937654
Scoping review of recent evidence on the management of pediatric urolithiasis: summary of meta-analyses, systematic reviews and relevant randomized controlled trials.
Chua ME, Kim JK, Ming JM, De Cotiis KN, Yang SS, Rickard M, Lorenzo AJ, Dos Santos J.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Oct;38(10):1349-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05190-3. Epub 2022 Aug 8. PMID: 35939126 Review.
Spontaneous renal rupture due to renal calculi: A case report and literature review
Yin G, Pan X, Tian H, Zhou Z, Li J, Tian F, Fan Q, Wang X, Qi L, Li Y.
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jul 26;24(3):588. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11525. eCollection 2022 Sep. PMID: 35949332
Lung contusion after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic stones: A case report
Yi JH, Wang D, Chen H, Li ZS, Hu LH.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e30063. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030063. PMID: 35960111
Extremely slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones
Somiya S, Koterazawa S, Ito K, Haitani T, Yamada H, Kanno T.
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01351-0. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35969268
Cost-utility analysis of shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic stone treatment in adults
Kilonzo MM, Dasgupta R, Thomas R, Aucott L, MacLennan S, Lam TBL, Anson K, Cameron S, Starr K, Burgess N, Keeley FX, Clark CT, N'Dow J, MacLennan G, McClinton S.
BJU Int. 2022 Jul 29. doi: 10.1111/bju.15862. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35974700
Stone disease in low- and middle-income countries: could augmented reality have a role in its management?
Watson G, Payne SR, Kunitsky K, Natchagande G, Mabedi C, Scotland KB.
BJU Int. 2022 Aug 22. doi: 10.1111/bju.15877. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35993671 Review.
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Nephrolithiasis among Young Adults: A 15-Year Population-Based Study
Zilberman DE, Erlich T, Kleinmann N, Sabler IM, Neheman A, Verhovsky G.J.
Pers Med. 2022 Aug 21;12(8):1345. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081345. PMID: 36013296
What is the best approach for pediatric kidney stones of moderate-sized between shock wave lithotripsy, ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery?
Unal U, Deniz ME, Ortoglu F, Vuruskan E, Anil H, Altunkol A.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05203-1. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36048242
Phytotherapy as ancillary treatment after urinary stone lithotripsy in pediatric age
Caione P, Salerno A, Collura G, De Dominicis M, Innocenzi M, Martucci C, Capozza N.
Ann Ital Chir. 2022;92:313-318. PMID: 36052473 Clinical Trial.
How well do ESWL nomograms predict treatment success in pediatric patients?
Çakıroğlu B, Gözüküçük A, Uyanik BS.
Urologia. 2022 Sep 2:3915603221122613. doi: 10.1177/03915603221122613. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36056585
Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric renal and ureteric stones: A therapeutic update
Peng T, Zhong H, Hu B, Zhao S.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 18;10:902573. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.902573. eCollection 2022. PMID: 36061394 Review
Impact of COVID-19 on the management and outcomes of ureteric stones in the UK: a multicentre retrospective study.
Byrne MHV, Georgiades F, Light A, Lovegrove CE, Dominic C, Rahman J, Kathiravelupillai S, Klatte T, Saeb-Parsy K, Kumar R, Howles S, Stewart GD, Turney B, Wiseman O.
COVID Stones Collaborative.BJU Int. 2022 Sep 9. doi: 10.1111/bju.15882. Online ahead of print. PMID: 36083711
Are all post-ESWL pancreatitis events clinically significant?
Singh APH, Talukdar R, Ramchandani M, Reddy DN.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul;7(7):593. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00119-4. PMID: 35709817 No abstract available
Role of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Indices in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Outcome in Patients With Nephrolithiasis
Singh A, Sakalecha AK.
Cureus. 2022 Mar 1;14(3):e22745. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22745. eCollection 2022 Mar. PMID: 35371859
Comparative effectiveness of paediatric kidney stone surgery (the PKIDS trial): study protocol for a patient-centred pragmatic clinical trial
Ellison JS, Lorenzo M, Beck H, Beck R, Chu DI, Forrest C, Huang J, Kratchman A, Kurth A, Kurth L, Kurtz M, Lendvay T, Sturm R, Tasian G
Pediatric KIDney Stone Care Improvement Network.BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 5;12(4):e056789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056789. PMID: 35383073
Factors influencing stone-free rate of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL); a cohort study
Wagenius M, Oddason K, Utter M, Popiolek M, Forsvall A, Lundström KJ, Linder A.
Scand J Urol. 2022 Apr 9:1-7. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2055137. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35400281
Pancreatic Stones: Clinical Outcomes With Nonsurgical Treatment in a Japanese Single-Center Study
Yamamoto S, Inui K, Katano Y, Miyoshi H, Kobayashi T, Tachi Y, Torii Y.
Pancreas. 2022 Feb 1;51(2):205-211. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001996. PMID: 35404899
A clinical observational study of effectiveness of a solid coupling medium in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Chang HH, Lin YC, Li CC, Wu WJ, Liou WC, Lin YE, Huang KK, Chen WC.
BMC Urol. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01001-y. PMID: 35413871
Efficacy of supine trans-abdominal pronated shock head ESWL for treatment of distal ureteric stones: A pilot study
Sarkar D, Wakle DU, Pal DK.
Urologia. 2022 Apr 15:3915603221091080. doi: 10.1177/03915603221091080. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35422154
Predictive urinary RNA biomarkers of kidney injury after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Tawfick A, Matboli M, Shamloul S, Agwa SHA, Saad M, Shaker H, Selim MMY, Salim MS, Radwan A, Shorbagy AA, Mousa W.
World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1561-1567. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03996-3. Epub 2022 Apr 15. PMID: 35428927
Does prior failed shock-wave lithotripsy impact outcomes of ureterorenoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Li H, Hu XF, Deng L, Zhang L, Li H.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Apr;26(7):2501-2510. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202204_28486. PMID: 35442465
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bosio A, Alessandria E, Dalmasso E, Agosti S, Vitiello F, Vercelli E, Bisconti A, Gontero P.
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Apr 21:S2405-4569(22)00081-5. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.004. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35466071
Which has more complications?-Shockwave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment of renal calculi with 1-year follow-up in an Australian population
Farag M, Jack GS, Papa N, Wong LM, Bolton DM, Lenaghan D.
BJUI Compass. 2021 Jul 1;2(4):275-280. doi: 10.1002/bco2.71. eCollection 2021 Jul. PMID: 35475295
The use of an artificial neural network in the evaluation of the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as a treatment of choice for urinary lithiasis
Tsitsiflis A, Kiouvrekis Y, Chasiotis G, Perifanos G, Gravas S, Stefanidis I, Tzortzis V, Karatzas A.
Asian J Urol. 2022 Apr;9(2):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 30. PMID: 35509481
Case of the Month' from Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK: ketamine uropathy with metallic stents and obstructing calculus
Hamilton-Baillie A, Lewis F, Menzies-Wilson R, Bryant RJ, Turney BW.
BJU Int. 2022 May;129(5):582-584. doi: 10.1111/bju.15729. PMID: 35543401
The First 100 Cases of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Korea: Matched Cohort Analyses versus Shock-Wave Lithotripsy.
Jung HD, Moon YJ, Almujalhem AJ, Alqahtani AA, Alkhureeb MA, Lee JY.
Yonsei Med J. 2022 May;63(5):440-445. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.5.440. PMID: 35512746
Urolithiasis in pregnancy: Advances in imaging modalities and evaluation of current trends in endourological approaches
Morgan K, Rees CD, Shahait M, Craighead C, Connelly ZM, Ahmed ME, Khater N.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;46(5):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 May 9. PMID: 35551890 Review. English, Spanish.
A randomized trial of adjuvant tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for renal stones after shock wave lithotripsy
Hashem A, El-Assmy AM, Sharaf DE, Elgamal M, Elzalouey AE, Laymon M.
Urolithiasis. 2022 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01330-5. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35576073
Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: urologic and therapeutic management
Kohli H, Kurtz MP.
Clin Kidney J. 2022 May 17;15(Suppl 1):i14-i16. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab187. eCollection 2022 May. PMID: 35592623 Review.
A grade Ⅳ renal injury patient after receiving twice extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) at intervals of less than three days.
Zhou Z, Dong C, Huang Y, Wang X.
Asian J Surg. 2022 May 18:S1015-9584(22)00580-2. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.035. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35597748 No abstract available.
Characterizing patients with multiple same-sided ureteric stones
Mancuso M, Lavoie C, Assmus M, De S.
World J Urol. 2022 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04035-x. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35622115
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side
Iqbal N, Iqbal S, Zareen N, Blair KAA.
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):833-837. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116. PMID: 35634635
Pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a patient concurrent with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a case report
Wang D, Xu J, Bi YW, Mei CL, Li ZS, Hu LH.
J Int Med Res. 2022 May;50(5):3000605221100748. doi: 10.1177/03000605221100748. PMID: 35634907
The Visceral-to-subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Area Ratio is Associated with Retreatment in Chronic Pancreatitis Patients with Pancreatolithiasis after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Yokoyama K, Takamura M, Watanabe J, Nakamura A, Sato Y, Sekine A, Terai S.
Intern Med. 2022 May 31. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9038-21. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35650122
Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic
Kurkar A, Elderwy AA, Osman MM, Abdelkawi IF, Shalaby MM, Abdelhafez MF.
Urolithiasis. 2022 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35657411
Incidence and safety outcomes associated with active stone removal procedures (ASRP): a comparison between neurological and non-neurological patients using the French National Health Data Base
Beraud F, Clément G, Lenne X, Biardeau X.
World J Urol. 2022 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04054-8. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35665842
Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology
Do MT, Ly TH, Choi MJ, Cho SY.
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 May 16. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220060. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35670002 Review.
Understanding cavitation-related mechanism of therapeutic ultrasound in the field of urology: Part I of therapeutic ultrasound in urology
Cho SY, Kwon O, Kim SC, Song H, Kim K, Choi MJ.
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 May 26. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220059. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35670003 Review.
The usefulness of the Hounsfield unit and stone heterogeneity variation in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome
Oktay C, Çoraplı M, Tutuş A.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 May;28(3):187-192. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20945. PMID: 35748199
Paediatric stone management: innovations and standards
Quhal F, Al Faddagh A, Silay MS, Straub M, Seitz C.
Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Jun 9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001004. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35674672
A systematic review of nomograms used in urolithiasis practice to predict clinical outcomes in paediatric patients
Kailavasan M, Berridge C, Yuan Y, Turner A, Donaldson J, Biyani CS.
J Pediatr Urol. 2022 May 21:S1477-5131(22)00211-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.05.013. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35676182
Review.
Shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of calcific renal artery stenosis after an inadequately expanded renal artery stent
Ahsan MJ, Taskesen T, Ugwu J, Latif A, Ahsan MZ, Chandran P, Ghali M.
Future Cardiol. 2022 Jun 9. doi: 10.2217/fca-2022-0015. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35678341
The intraureteral placement of the stent's distal end decreases stent-related urinary symptoms: a prospective randomized clinical trial
Tzou KY, Chen KC, Wu CC, Hu SW, Ho CH.
World J Urol. 2022 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04057-5. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35678894
Efficacy of Adjuvant Tamsulosin for Improving the Stone-Free Rate after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Renal Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Maldonado-Valadez RE, Valdez-Vargas AD, Alvarez JA, Rodea-Montero ER.
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jan 31;2022:3757588. doi: 10.1155/2022/3757588. eCollection 2022. PMID: 35685573 . Clinical Trial.
Acute extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteric stones - 7-years' experience from a busy district general hospital.
Young MJ, Pang KH, Elmussarah M, Hughes PF, Browning AJ, Symons SJ.
BJU Int. 2022 Jun 10. doi: 10.1111/bju.15820. Online ahead of print. PMID: 35689415
Endoscopic Management of Complex Biliary Stones
Phillpotts S, Webster G, Arvanitakis M.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022 Jul;32(3):477-492.
doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 May 11. PMID: 35691692. Review.
Factors influencing stone-free rate of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL); a cohort study
Wagenius M; Oddason K; Utter M; Popiolek M; Forsvall A; Lundström KJ; Lindner A.
Scand J Urol. 2022 Apr 9;1-7. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2055137. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 35400281
Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Sharma G; Pareek T; Tyagi S; Kaundal P; Yadav AK; Thummala Y; Devana SK.
Sci Rep.2021 Jun 3;11(1):11811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3.
PMID: 34083725
Acute pancreatitis with giant pancreatic pseudocyst as a complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A case report and literature review
Alzeerelhouseini HIA; Abuzneid YS; Ashhab HA.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 May 26;66:102442. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102442. eCollection 2021 Jun.
PMID: 34136213
Life threatening hepatic hemorrhage after shockwave lithotripsy - A case report and review of literature
Budzyn J; Leavitt D.
Urol Case Rep. 2021 May 24;38:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101724. eCollection 2021 Sep.
PMID: 34136358
Correlative investigation between routine clinical parameters of dual-energy computed tomography and the outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis: a retrospective study
Tu B; Jia J; Yu L; Li H; Wang D.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03162-0. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 34114086
Predict success of shock wave lithotripsy was still interesting and challenging
Zheng Z, Xu J, Peng L, Zhong W.
World J Urol. 2021 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03758-7. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 34136946
Kallidonis P; Adamou C; Ntasiotis P; Pietropaolo A; Somani B; Özsoy M; Liourdi D; Sarica K; Liatsikos E; Tailly T.
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jun 22. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 34156200
Does previous unsuccessful shockwave lithotripsy influence the outcomes of ureteroscopy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wang W; Peng L; Di X; Gao X; Wei X.
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2122-2132. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-39.
PMID: 34159093
Erectile Dysfunction A Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Men With Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
Ladegaard PBJ; Mortensen J; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Lund L.
Sex Med. 2021 Jun;9(3):100338. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100338. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
PMID: 33789173
External Validation of the S.T.O.N.E. Score in Predicting Stone-Free Status After Rigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Sirirak N; Sangkum P; Phengsalae Y; Kongchareonsombat W; Leenanupunth C; Ratanapornsompong W; Ketsuwan C.
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Mar 23;13:147-154. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S304221. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33791248
Association between renal urolithiasis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy therapy and new-onset hypertension: an updated meta-analysis
Wu Q; Liang R; Huang Y; Tan C; Zhu G; Chen Y; Cao L; Zou B; Li X; Wang H; Wang X; Tang T; Wu T.
J Int Med Res. 2021 Apr;49(4):3000605211002003.
PMID: 33794678
Improves symptoms and urinary biomarkers in refractory interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients randomized to extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus placebo
Shen YC; Tyagi P; Lee WC; Chancellor M; Chuang YC.
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 6;11(1):7558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87040-1.
PMID: 33824389
Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Li G.
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1202-1211. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1423.
PMID: 33850755
Contemporary considerations in the management and treatment of lower pole stones
Alam R; Matlaga BR; Alam A; Winoker JS.
Int Braz J Urol. Sep-Oct 2021;47(5):957-968. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0010.
PMID: 33861542
Small bowel obstruction and strangulation secondary to an adhesive internal hernia post ESWL for right ureteral calculi: a case report and review of literature
Gitonga EN; Shen H.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01760-2.
PMID: 33865311
Atlas of scoring systems, grading tools and nomograms in Endourology: A comprehensive overview from The TOWER Endourological Society research group
Jones P; Pietropaolo A; Chew BH; Somani BK.
J Endourol. 2021 Apr 20. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0124. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33878937
Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Intermediate or low: a prospective randomized study
Kaygisiz O; Cicek MC; Mert A; Akesen S; Sarandol E; Kilicarslan H.
World J Urol. 2021 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03696-4. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33890144
Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest
Bulbul E; Ilki FY; Gultekin MH; Erozenci A; Tutar O; Citgez S; Tansu N; Onal B.
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14264. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14264. Epub 2021 May 4.
PMID: 33891784
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Stone-Free Status after Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rice P; Pugh M; Geraghty R; Hameed BZ; Shah M; Somani BK.
Urology. 2021 Apr 21;S0090-4295(21)00331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.006. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33894229
The evaluation of morphology of renal pelvicalyceal system's and infundibulopelvic anatomy of kidney's lower pole in post-mortem series
Çiçek R; Dündar G; Gökçen K; Gökçe G; Gültekin EY.
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021 Apr 26. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2021.0041. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33899205
Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Brain E; Geraghty RM; Lovegrove CE; Yang B; Somani BK.
J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):526-538. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001836. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
PMID: 33904756
The effect of music on state anxiety in patients undergoing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Dogan S; Ceylan C.
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;75(8):e14293. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14293. Epub 2021 May 13.
PMID: 33930234
Effect of media distraction (audio-visual and music) for pain and anxiety control in patients undergoing shock-wave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hu W; Yang K; Zhang L; Lu X.
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jun;21(6):623. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10055. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
PMID: 33936280
Optimal Timing of Endoscopic Intervention After Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Chronic Calcified Pancreatitis.
Guo JY; Qian YY; Sun H; Chen H; Zou WB; Hu LH; Li ZS; Xin L; Liao Z.
Pancreas. 2021 Apr 1;50(4):633-638. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001810.
PMID: 33939679
Artificial intelligence in stone disease.
Ganesan V; Pearle MS.
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Jul 1;31(4):391-396. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000896.
PMID: 33965985
Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity
Yoon JH; Park S; Kim SC; Park S; Moon KH; Cheon SH; Kwon T.
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1588-1595. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1397.
PMID: 33968647
Automated Generation of Personalized Shock Wave Lithotripsy Protocols: Treatment Planning Using Deep Learning
Chen Z; Zeng DD; Seltzer RGN; Hamilton BD.
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 11;9(5):e24721. doi: 10.2196/24721.
PMID: 33973862
RE: Immediate Shockwave Lithotripsy vs Delayed Shockwave Lithotripsy After Urgent Ureteral Stenting in Patients with Ureteral or Pyeloureteral Urolithiasis: A Matched-Pair Analysis
Rizzo M; Umari P; Bucci S; Trombetta C.J.
J Endourol. 2021 May 12. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0116. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33980029
Can we successfully predict the outcome for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for medium size renal stones? A single-center experience
Elawady H; Mahmoud MA; Samir M.
Urologia. 2021 May 13;3915603211016355. doi: 10.1177/03915603211016355. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33985373
The Effect of Low-intensity Shockwave Therapy on Non-neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
Sokolakis I; Pyrgidis N; Neisius A,; Gierth M; Knoll T; Rassweiler J; Hatzichristodoulou G.
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 May 10;S2405-4569(21)00127-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.021.
PMID: 33985934
Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Ureteric Stones - State-of-the-Art Review
Bhanot R; Jones P; Somani B.
Res Rep Urol. 2021 May 6;13:227-236. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S311010. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33987110
Newly designed solid coupling medium for reducing trapped air pockets during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy_ a phantom study
Wang CS; Li CC; Wu WJ; Liou WC; Lin YE; Chen WC.
BMC Urol. 2021 May 14;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00847-y.
PMID: 33990213
Use of ultra-low dose computed tomography versus abdominal plain film for assessment of stone-free rates after shock-wave lithotripsy: implications on emergency room visits, surgical procedures, and cost-effectiveness
Sood A; Wong P; Borchert A; Budzyn J; Keeley J; Heilbronn C; Eilender B; Littleton R; Leavitt DA.
Urolithiasis. 2021 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01273-3. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 33993338
Endoscopic retrieval of a proximally migrated biliary stent using extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy, and cholangioscopy with minisnare
Weaver MJ; Kushnir VM.
VideoGIE. 2021 Feb 27;6(5):231-233. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.01.005. eCollection 2021 May.
PMID: 34027256
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial
Ahmed AF; Abdelazeim H; ElMesery M; El-Feky M; Gomaa A; Tagreda I; Abozied H; Fahim A.
BJU Int. 2021 May 24. doi: 10.1111/bju.15493. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 34028170
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for the medium-sized renal stones
Gao X; Hu X; Wang W; Chen J; Wei T; Wei X.
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Apr;73(2):187-195. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04185-0.
PMID: 34036766
European Association of Urology and European Society for Paediatric Urology Guidelines on Paediatric Urinary Stone Disease
Tekgül S; Stein R; Bogaert G; Nijman RJM; Quaedackers J; 't Hoen L; Silay MS; Radmayr C; Doğan HS.
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 May 26;S2405-4569(21)00158-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.006.
PMID: 34052169
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Combined Therapy in Children: Efficacy and Long-Term Results
Burgos Lucena L; Fernández Bautista B; Parente Hernández A; Ortiz Rodríguez R; Angulo Madero JM.
Front Pediatr. 2021 May 13;9:609664. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.609664. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34055678
Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Birowo, P; Rangganata, E; Rasyid, N; Atmoko, W.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244295
PMID: 33370372
Massive Hemoperitoneum Secondary to Splenic Laceration After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy
Salih, AA; Turan, OA; Bakal, O; Volio, A; Ayad, S.
Cureus. 2020 Nov 5;12(11):e11341
PMID: 33304677
Colour-coded density-gradients stone mapping: A novel reporting system for stone density on non-contrast computed tomography and its clinical applications
Adel Atta, M; Abdeldaeim, HM; Hashad, MME; Shabaan, MS.
Arab J Urol. 2020 Jul 7;18(4):247-251
PMID: 33312736
Extremely-slow, half-number shockwave lithotripsy for asymptomatic renal stones <20 mm
Ito, K; Takahashi, T; Kanno, T; Okada, T; Higashi, Y; Yamada, H.
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Jan;62(1):72-78.
PMID: 33314807
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome
Skaudickas, D; Telksnys, T; Veikutis, V; Aniulis, P; Jievaltas, M.
Open Med (Wars). 2020 Jul 1;15(1):580-585
PMID: 33336014
Clinical results of shock wave lithotripsy treatment in elderly patients with kidney stones: Results of 1433 patients
Ozer, C; Tekin, MI.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020 Dec 18;92(4).
PMID: 33348965
Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics for pain reduction during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Wang, Z; Chen, G; Wang, J; Wei, W.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 5;15(10):e0237783.
PMID: 33017397
Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
Omran, M; Sakr, A; Desoky, EAE; Ali, MM; Abdalla, MMH.
Arab J Urol. 2020 Mar 23;18(2):106-111
PMID: 33029415
Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Difficult-to-retrieve Common Bile Duct Stones: A Ten-year Experience
Manzoor Ul Haque, M; Hassan Luck, N; Ali Tasneem, A; Mudassir Laeeq, S; Mandhwani, R; Hanif, FM; Ullah Lail, G:
J Transl Int Med. 2020 Sep 25;8(3):159-164.
PMID: 33062592
How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.
Petrides, N; Ismail, S; Anjum, F; Sriprasad, S.
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S19-S26.
PMID: 33135997
Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopy-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones
Chang, TH; Lin, WR; Tsai, WK; Chiang, PK; Chen, M; Tseng, JS; Chiu, AW.
BMC Urol. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):183.
PMID: 33172476
Against the Odds: Management of Ureteral Calculus in Patient With Crossed Fused Renal Ectopia
Alić, J; Lepara, Z; Spahović, H; Bajramović, S; Heljić, J.
Cureus. 2020 Oct 11;12(10):e10895.
PMID: 33194464
Combined extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ERCP for chronic calcific pancreatitis with the patient under general anesthesia in one session: an introduction to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and a case example
Patel, S; Gómez, V.
VideoGIE. 2020 Nov 3;5(11):513-516.
PMID: 33204903
Prediction of burden and management of renal calculi from whole kidney radiomics: a multicenter study
Homayounieh, F; Doda Khera, R; Bizzo, BC; Ebrahimian, S; Primak, A; Schmidt, B; Saini, S; Kalra, MK.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Nov 26;1-10.
PMID: 33242099
Does silodosin offer better results than tamsulosin as medical expulsive treatment after shock wave lithotripsy for single distal ureteric stones?
Pricop, C; Șerban, DN; Șerban, IL; Cumpanas AA.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Dec;15(4):602-607.
PMID: 33294076
Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Skuginna, V; Nguyen, DP; Seiler, R; Kiss, B; Thalmann, GN; Roth, B.
Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):267-73
PMID: 26119561 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
The feasibility of shockwave lithotripsy for treating solitary, lower calyceal stones over 1 cm in size.
Kim, TB; Lee, SC; Kim, KH; Jung, H; Yoon, SJ; Oh, JK.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Mar-Apr;7(3-4):E156-60.
PMID: 23589749 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography.
Rippel, CA; Nikkel, L; Lin, YK; Danawala, Z; Olorunnisomo, V; Youssef, RF; Pearle, MS; Lotan, Y; Raman, JD.
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2246-51.
PMID: 23083650 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.
Connors, BA; McAteer, JA; Evan, AP; Blomgren, PM; Handa, RK; Johnson, CD; Gao, S; Pishchalnikov, YA; Lingeman, JE.
BJU Int. 2012 Nov;110(9):1376-85.
PMID: 22519983 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis.
Razvi, H; Fuller, A; Nott, L; Méndez-Probst, CE; Leistner, R; Foell, K; Davé, S; Denstedt, JD.
J Endourol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1478-82.
PMID: 22712655 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter.
Elkoushy, MA; Hassan, JA; Morehouse, DD; Anidjar, M; Andonian, S.
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):759-63.
PMID: 21550641 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
The lithotripsy table height: a novel predictor of outcome in shockwave lithotripsy.
Ossandon, E; Recabal, P; Acevedo, C; Flores, JM; Marchant, F.
Int Braz J Urol. 2011 May-Jun;37(3):355-61.
PMID: 21756383 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
A prospective randomised trial comparing the modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 lithotripter.
Zehnder, P; Roth, B; Birkhäuser, F; Schneider, S; Schmutz, R; Thalmann, GN; Studer, UE.
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):637-44.
PMID: 21296481 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
[A single center experience with a lithotripsy machine "Modulith SLX-F2" : evaluation of dual focus system and clinical results].
Suzuki, K; Yamashita, Y; Yoshida, M; Matuzaki, J.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2010 Feb;56(2):81-6.
PMID: 20185991 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?
Tiselius HG.
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):249-55.
PMID: 18294029 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
In vitro comparison of shock wave lithotripsy machines.
Teichman, JM; Portis, AJ; Cecconi, PP; Bub, WL; Endicott, RC; Denes, B; Pearle, MS; Clayman, RV.
J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1259-64.
PMID: 10992376 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
